Kim Scott, Juan Gabriel Vásquez: Social and Political Histories
Writers and Readers 2012
Kim Scott, Juan Gabriel Vásquez: Social and Political Histories
I’ve often contemplated the idea of imaginative or creative writing as political act. With this set of glasses on I’ve been interested to hear Denise Mina’s description of her move from academic feminist to crime writer and challenged by Jo Nesbo’s declaration that he has no political agenda.
This session explores the work of Kim Scott and Juan Gabriel Vásquez, or perhaps the writers themselves and their process, in relation to political and social histories. Tina Makereti begins her discussion with a question about how the writers see the relationship between their work and politics and social history. Vásquez says he has been obsessed with the place where individual destiny intersects with events. Traditionally this has been the place of capital ‘H’ history but he explains that it is different when a writer writes fiction. He says the sole reason for a novel is to tell the things that only that novel can tell. For a novel to be worthwhile, he believes, it must tell the reader things that can only thereafter be found in that novel. He says this is what makes the intersect between politics and fiction tricky to navigate because political diction is as opposed as you can get from the purpose of a novel. Political diction is incapable of illuminating because its sole aim is to tell you what you already know or to simplify what you don’t. There are no lessons in political language only a motivation to convince you – that is all that matters in political language.
Read more »

Contact
Newsagent
Login








