Logo
Contact Newsagent Login
Scoop Search
    Book Reviews Articles Five Books Poems Releases Picks Talks & Events
Tweet

Second World War in Context

December 8, 2009Book Reviews2 comments
Beyond the Battlefield: New Zealand and its Allies 1939-45 by Gerald Hensley
Penguin Books, $65. Reviewed by DENNIS ROSE

A few years ago I visited the grave of a friend’s brother who had fallen, in April 1945, crossing a river near Faenza in Northern Italy. Despite kiwi fruit growing in the fields next to the cemetery it seemed a long way from home.

Gerald Hensley’s Beyond the Battlefield, published by the Penguin Group, with acknowledgements to the National Army Museum, outlines New Zealand’s foreign policy before and during the Second World War. It helps explain that remote grave by tracing the political and military decisions that deployed New Zealand servicemen, and women, to many of the main theatres of war. The span is similar to that of F.L.W. Wood’s official war history volume The New Zealand People at War: Political and External Affairs, but with a primary emphasis on external affairs and much assisted by access to British, American and Australian (but not Russian) archives. It is a well-researched, well-presented, and stimulating review.

The core group responsible for New Zealand’s war policy was, in Hensley’s words ‘startlingly small … barely more than a half dozen, with virtually no participation by the public and very few others in government’. Michael Savage, the Prime Minister when war began, was soon to die and be succeeded by Peter Fraser, who, along with his deputy, Walter Nash, (also Minister of Finance and for a time resident minister in Washington) carried the central political load. Carl Berendsen and Alister McIntosh, successive heads of the Prime Minister’s Department pioneered the way in New Zealand’s external relations. Bernard Freyberg commanded the New Zealand Division in Greece, Crete, North Africa and Italy

We are not strangers to war, but looking back over seventy years it hard to grasp the scale of the disasters wrought twice during the first half of the twentieth century. The First World War was arguably an accident waiting to happen and might have been averted by more skilful diplomacy. The Second World War was a matter of choice, for Germany in its attack on Poland and, reluctantly, for Britain and France, who declared war when Germany ignored their ultimatum to desist, and for Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and Canada who chose to join with Britain. France was soon overrun, humiliated and occupied, leaving Britain and the Dominions to fight alone until 1941, when German invasion and Japanese attack brought the Soviet Union and the United States into the alliance that would ultimately prevail and lay down the framework of the post-war world.

New Zealand’s decision to go to war stemmed both from its relationship with Britain and its advocacy during the 1930s of collective resistance, in terms of the League of Nations Covenant, to aggressive acts by Japan, Italy and Germany. For a small country resistance was only possible in association with a major power and the imperial link to Britain provided that power. Menzies, the Australian Prime Minister, saw the link as determinative. If the King was at war so was Australia and he lodged a notice in the Commonwealth Gazette to that effect. For New Zealand, which still relied on the office of the Governor-General for coded communications from the British government, the problem lay in ensuring that New Zealand’s independent declaration followed as immediately as possible on that by Britain. Prime Minister Savage’s broadcast statement ‘both with gratitude for the past and with confidence for the future, we range ourselves without fear beside Britain. Where she goes we go; where she stands, we stand’, was clearly not a long-term forecast, but captured a national commitment to resist aggression and to accept British leadership in that fight.

How to implement this decision in a nation with only 2,500 persons in the armed forces? In 1936 the Labour government had decided to focus on the development of air defence, a decision that led through the Empire Training Scheme to significant contributions through the RAF and later the RNZAF. New Zealand had two cruisers operating as part of the British navy. But the main call was for soldiers and the general expectation was that, as in previous wars, New Zealand would despatch an expeditionary force to the main theatre of war. The first echelon of that force departed for Egypt in January 1940 and by the end of that year the 2nd New Zealand Division had been brought together under Freyberg.

Freyberg’s charter authorised him to communicate directly with the New Zealand government and with his Commander-in Chief on ‘all details leading up to or arising from policy decisions’. He was concerned to keep his men together as a national force rather than see them dispersed as units within wider army groupings. Concentration carried the risk of devastating and comprehensive loss but in the outcome the 2nd Division fought its way as a unit through the retreats from Greece and Crete to the turn around battle at El Alamein, thence across North Africa and ultimately to the north of Italy and Trieste.

New Zealand deployed troops to Europe despite fears of possible war with Japan, which became actuality with the attack on Pearl Harbour in late 1941 and Japanese expansion into the Philippines, Malaya, Singapore, the then Dutch East Indies and Papua New Guinea. Australia responded by switching its main forces from Europe to the Pacific theatre, home defence and Papua New Guinea. Should New Zealand do likewise? Hensley’s chapter Staying in the Mediterranean tells the story, which intersects with the contemporaneous strategic, ‘Europe first’ decision by Roosevelt and Churchill, both of whom favoured retention of New Zealand forces in North Africa. Australia felt differently and in Hensley’s view the damage done to the relationship with Australia remains perhaps the strongest counter argument to the decision to let the 2nd Division stay put.

By the beginning of 1943 New Zealand’s major strategic decisions had been made. New Zealand became a temporary base and springboard for United States troops heading towards one or other of the island campaigns. New Zealand own deployments into the Pacific increased but never to the extent of another division. Indeed allied demands for food production created a competing demand for New Zealand manpower to be deployed at home.

At the diplomatic level attention was turning to the shape of the post-war world. The immediate needs of war led to the opening of offices in Canberra and Washington, and to a continuing sequence of ministerial visits to those same capitals and to London. The longer-term issue was the design of post-war institutions that might prove more effective than the League of Nations. New Zealand, Australia and Canada were active, if minor, players in the founding stages of the United Nations, so active indeed as to cause the then Soviet Foreign Minister, Andrei Gromyko, to accuse Fraser, Evatt and McKenzie King of making fools of themselves in opposing the granting of veto powers to the US, UK, USSR, France and China.

In the event the threat of nuclear weapons reduced the risk of resort to all-out war by radically escalating the likely consequences. That deal with the devil has not prevented a long sequence of lesser wars. Nuclear weapons have provided a shield under which the major powers have been able to fight wars as devastating as those in Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. The United Nations peacekeeping framework can claim some successes but the founders would be disappointed by much of what they would see today. Other things would provide some consolation. The creation of the International Criminal Court and the active role of the UN in climate change negotiation would confirm their view of the necessity of developing institutions that enable collective responses to problems that affect us all. The creation of an international price on carbon will mark an important further step along that road.

Finally one editorial matter. Index references to major figures such as Fraser and Freyberg give nothing more than lists of page numbers. In contrast the official war history volumes give brief indications of subject matter (56 such entries in the case of Fraser), which saves a lot of frustration in searching for particular entries. It is a pity Penguin did not do the same, as indeed they have in some other volumes on my shelf.

LINKS

Listener article.
NZ Herald Review
Dominion Post article

Dennis Rose is a Wellington economist and keen reader of history.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Scoopit
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Trackback-URL
  • Print this post Print this post
  • Email this post Email this post
  • comments feed for this post
Tweet
 

2 comments:

  1. Kerry, 13. December 2009, 21:52

    Great review.

    Now I really want to get my hands on a copy of Hensley’s book.

     
  2. Trevor Osborne, 1. March 2012, 14:45

    Do you have a book the 24th nz infrantry battllion apictorial history

     

Write a comment:

 

Search books.scoop.co.nz


  • Book Blogs

    • Beattie’s Book Blog
    • Bruce Connew
    • complete review
    • Crime Watch
    • Good Books (profits go to Oxfam)
    • Guernica Mag
    • NZ Book Council
    • NZ Booksellers
  • Festival

    • Auckland Writers Festival
    • NZ Festival
  • Journal

    • Alluvium Journal
    • New Internationalist Magazine
    • Radical Philosophy
    • Urbanomic
  • NZ Author Sites

    • Chad Taylor
    • Fiona Kidman
    • Joan Druett
    • Paul Cleave
    • Rachael King
    • Reading the Maps
  • NZ Publishers

    • Allen Unwin
    • AUP
    • Awa Press
    • BWB
    • Cape Catley Books
    • Craig Potton
    • CUP
    • Gecko Press
    • Hachette
    • Otago University Press
    • Penguin Random House NZ
    • Public Address Books
    • Scholastic New Zealand
    • Titus
    • VUP
  • Review Sites

    • Australian Book Review
    • Internet Review of Books
    • LRB
    • Meanjin
    • New Zealand Books
    • NY Review of Books
    • Oxonian Review of Books
    • The Paris Review
  • Recent Posts

    • Living Abroad
    • Not So Sweet
    • Women Vote!
    • Poet of Many Parts
    • A History Lesson for Silicon Valley
    • Fantasy Land
    • Daily Dawn
    • Take Flight
    • Our Great War
    • Release: Digital Reading

    Text Links


    Recent Comments

    • John Tasker: If people like Doutre and Bolt...
    • Fran Tilley: Great review sounds like a fas...
    • A Christie: I saw this book a few weeks ag...
    • deano: I'll have to get a copy! I was...
    • T: Nice review rowan...
    • Kiri McCart: Hi Keri, I would very much li...
    • Henry Balfour: "The question, then, is who do...
    • Sarah Jane Parton: I guess I was comparing his 'k...
    • ChrisA: Don't know if I'd call Matt Mi...
    • Erin: Surely, that if Martin is righ...

    Categories

    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • BWB Texts
    • Children's Books
    • Excerpt
    • Featured Releases
    • Five Books…
    • Interviews
    • Poems
    • Releases
    • SRB Picks
    • Talks & Events

    Monthly Archives

    • March 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • June 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • July 2014
    • June 2014
    • May 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • October 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • September 2010
    • July 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008

    Feeds

    • RSS Posts
    • RSS Comments

    Recently on Scoop

    • North Korea: 'It's the next steps that are important' says P
    • Bankrolling the big prizes for NZ journalism
    • Tackling money-laundering in NZ: More needs to be done
    • Excitement over Commonwealth-wide free trade agreement
    • Quantifying climate change policy changes a difficult exerci
    • Military and media missiles
    • Urban sprawl eating up NZ's productive land - report
    • Fair Enough? - Tax HiveMind Midpoint Update
    • The present day composer refuses to die – NZSO plays Zappa
    • MFAT used Thompson + Clark for security at TPP protest

    Scoop Review of Books © 2018 | Powered by Scoop Media | Terms of Use